The weather has been cooperating a little better this last week, and I've been able to try out my battery-based imaging setup. I haven't done much more than image an hour here, a couple of hours there, but the results are about as expected.
Here are two images from my inner red zone back yard,
M42:
As you can see I was unable to completely eradicate the sky brightness gradient.
The Rosette:
Both are taken without filters only because I don't have one. A decent filter would have improved these greatly.
Here are a couple from some distance north of the Twin Cities in a yellow zone,
75m of the M81/82 area:
I have this delusion that I'll be able to image the integrated flux nebula.
The southern portion of Auriga (including some dark lines from tree branches):
The first two images came out horribly red/magenta heavy, and it was a lot of work getting the color right. I passed that off as a consequence of the camera mod and light pollution. The second two appeared just as red on the display screen while working on getting the exposure right, but they came out fairly neutral because I chose the ImagesPlus RAW conversion that ignores the camera's white balance; I used "Bayer No White Balance" instead of "At Capture White Balanced Color."
Color balance isn't an issue when CCD imaging, particularly if your filters are balanced by the manufacturer to give equal white signals in each channel.
The question is now which is better, a custom white balance or using the "no white balance" processing option. There's only one way to find out, and that will require a sunny day, a few sheets of white printer paper, and a clear night. That's my next task.
Oh, and the battery worked perfectly. It's nice to have the power right there in such a light package. 35Ah, less than 23 pounds. My little battery case now has two power sockets, but the volt meter has yet to arrive.
The ramblings of an amateur astronomer with interests that range far and wide in the heavenly hobby
Showing posts with label ImagesPlus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ImagesPlus. Show all posts
Friday, March 11, 2016
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Two images from last weekend: M17, M20/21; Processing workflow.
I'm REALLY pleased with how this image of M17 came out:
The previous night's image was not quite as successful--M20 and 21. More about why in the next blog entry.
Both images are full-frame. For all the gory details of acquisition, look at my gallery on AstroBin. By way of a quick summary, both are LRGB images made with an SBIG ST8300M CCD, TeleVue 102 apo and autoguided CGEM mount under mag 6+ skies. Dark and bias frames only, no flats.
| Messier 17 (Omega or Swan Nebula), click for full size |
| M20 (Triffid) and M21 |
Imaging is SO much faster doing LRGB in the dark than it is to use narrowband filters under light-polluted skies.
I realize that the colors in the M17 image may look a little muted to you, but I kind of like them this way. What's particularly pleasing about the image from my standpoint is three-fold: The stars are nice and round right out to the edge of the field, meaning that my field flattener is doing its job perfectly; The merging of the LRGB channels seems to be spot-on. And finally, guiding with the Orion mini-guider works great at the 700mm focal length of the TV102 to correct mount errors. I'll eventually try out the mini on my C925.
My processing workflow continues to evolve. These two images were made by ping-ponging back and forth between Images Plus and Photoshop:
- Calibrate, align and stack using IP
- Stretch using PS
- Noise cleanup and star size reduction in IP
- LRGB combine in PS using Annie's Actions
- Color balance in IP
- Masked sharpening in PS
Labels:
autoguiding,
CGEM,
image processing,
ImagesPlus,
LRGB,
M17,
M20,
M21,
Orion mini-guider,
Photoshop,
ST8300M,
TV-102
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Clouds, WOW, Focal Reducer
The abysmal spring of 2013 continues with clouds, clouds and more clouds. My plan to attend the Wisconsin Observers Weekend this weekend has fallen through because of weather. The first night is being clouded out as I type this, Tomorrow night is forecast to be partly cloudy (at best) and Saturday night is forecast to be rainy (50% chance) and cloudy.
Worst. Spring. Ever.
But anyway, I did manage last week to shoot some test images with my .63 Celestron Focal Reducer. I fiddle with my adapters until I got a spacing of about 104mm (I think), and here's what I got:
This is taken using a Celestron 925 XLT and Celestron 0.63 Focal Reducer/Flattener. The camera is an SBIG-ST8300M with filter wheel (total back focus 38mm). Spacing was provided by a Celestron SCT-to-T adapter #93633-A (about 58mm).
The above full-field image is six 10 second exposures (2x2 binned) aligned and stacked, then given a stretch by Images Plus. The scope was not even roughly polar aligned and was unguided. I was also shooting through overhead power lines. Yechh.
I think it's fairly flat, at least flat enough to make me happy. Some vignetting is present, but it's about the same as found when imaging without the FR. I will probably tinker with the spacing in the future.
What's nice is that this setup gives a much more solid connection between the scope and camera. I look forward to using it SHOULD THE FREAKING SKY EVER CLEAR. Really, no, I'm okay, but thanks for asking.
Worst. Spring. Ever.
But anyway, I did manage last week to shoot some test images with my .63 Celestron Focal Reducer. I fiddle with my adapters until I got a spacing of about 104mm (I think), and here's what I got:
![]() |
| Flat Field test |
The above full-field image is six 10 second exposures (2x2 binned) aligned and stacked, then given a stretch by Images Plus. The scope was not even roughly polar aligned and was unguided. I was also shooting through overhead power lines. Yechh.
I think it's fairly flat, at least flat enough to make me happy. Some vignetting is present, but it's about the same as found when imaging without the FR. I will probably tinker with the spacing in the future.
What's nice is that this setup gives a much more solid connection between the scope and camera. I look forward to using it SHOULD THE FREAKING SKY EVER CLEAR. Really, no, I'm okay, but thanks for asking.
Labels:
C9.25,
C925,
Celestron,
Celestron 0.63X focal reducer,
field flatness,
ImagesPlus,
Wisconsin Observers Weekend
Friday, May 25, 2012
Canon Lens on SBIG, ImagesPlus upgrade
Last week my Canon lens-to-SBIG ST8300M adapter arrived. Beautifully machined, it is. Expensive, it is! I tried it out with my 50mm f/1.8 and 17-70mm f 2.8-f4.5 zoom lenses. Images showed nice stars at the center of the fields, but progressive defocus toward the edges. I should not have expected anything different, since I had the lenses wide open.
How does one stop down a fully automatic Canon lens? Turns out it's easy, just follow these instructions. They work for me. My thanks to Haje Jan Kamps for posting them at pixiq!
Now if it would clear up for one night I could test the improvement.
I also upgraded to ImagesPlus 4.5, but am having a little trouble getting my old serial number to complete the registration. The always-helpful Mike Unsold, creator of IP, is on the case, so I should be up and running soon.
How does one stop down a fully automatic Canon lens? Turns out it's easy, just follow these instructions. They work for me. My thanks to Haje Jan Kamps for posting them at pixiq!
Now if it would clear up for one night I could test the improvement.
I also upgraded to ImagesPlus 4.5, but am having a little trouble getting my old serial number to complete the registration. The always-helpful Mike Unsold, creator of IP, is on the case, so I should be up and running soon.
Labels:
adapters,
astrophotography,
EOS lens,
ImagesPlus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




